[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: An idea: a database of modules settings
On Tue, 7 May 1996, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:

> My original suggestion was to have a kernel API, but the persistent data should not be stored
> inside the kernel but on a file.
> I guess insmod/rmmod can do it too, to a point, if a format way is established
> by which insmod knowd where the parameters are stored (and makes it available
> to the module init) and the module lets rmmod know where the outgoing data
> is. Maybe just another well-known symbol like the init/cleanup.
> It is importanat that not only detection info is saved but also user settable
> modes (from ioctl).

Wouldn't it be sufficient to create a directory where the modules can stuff
this info and allow the module writers to change their code as they will?
(Or patch the modules yourself, if you like.)

This otherwise unremarkable language is distinguished by the absence of
an "S" in its character set; users must substitute "TH". LITHP is said
to be useful in protheththing lithtth.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.112 / U:2.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site