Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 6 May 1996 14:39:47 +0300 (EET DST) | From | Johan Myréen <> | Subject | Re: Linux logo |
| |
> > > > Does anyone with a fireproof vest and a good drawing hand want to > > hmm. i don't think FreeBSD is the "adversary" here, but Windows 95 > > certainly is. how about a penguin smashing in a window or something? > how about the penguin knocking down and standing on the old Win 3.1 splash
I don't think the Logo should attack *any* operating system, not BSD nor Windows. As somebody said already: If Linux is so great, why are we attacking BSD? And if Windows is such a pile of crap, why would we even care to mention it? Let Linux stand out on its own merits. Action speaks louder than words.
My vote goes for a simple, professionally done and easily recognizable symbol. (I know, it isn't easy.) Isn't that what a logo is all about, a simple symbol done with style, which immediately makes the viewer think of the product it symbolizes?
Johan Myreen jem@iki.fi
Ps. Ray-traced pictures are getting *boring*, IMHO...
|  |