Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 3 May 1996 13:49:08 +0100 (BST) | From | Bryn Paul Arnold Jones <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: /proc/cflags |
| |
On Fri, 3 May 1996, Joe Fouche wrote:
> Bryn Paul Arnold Jones wrote: > > > > > Hmm, After seeing this, I think I'll write a /proc/kitchen_sink, or > > /proc/rubbish/kitchen_sink. Wha'dya think ? > > (dons his flame-retardant suit) >
(Yep, Mee too, just saw I forgot the ;)'s in my last post)
> The /proc entry might indeed be fluff, but there is certainly an > argument for having CFLAGS defined as part of the kernel's data. To > wit, it's currently impossible to tell what CFLAGS were used on > a kernel image. > > Then at least someone doing debugging can print it out. > > <comments/flames welcome> >
Yep, I can see the use, I just forgot the ;)'s, oh well ....
> > Bryn > > -- > > PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Do /proc/pgppassphrase ;) > Yep, that would help ;) (better than the Post-it on the monitor). Bryn -- PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence again :( | initiated. / This space is intentionally left | blank, apart from this text ;-) \____________________________________
|  |