Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 3 May 1996 16:17:04 +0000 (GMT) | From | "James L. McGill" <> | Subject | Re: linux on HFS? why not HPFS instead? |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 2 May 1996, Simon Karpen wrote:
karpens} However, this is obviously a pretty long way off as we don't even yet karpens} have read-write HPFS support yet.
I had assumed that the reason for no HPFS write support was that IBM or whoever would not release data, or something. I assumed that, since there wasn't even an experimental, dangerous, guaranteed-to-trash-your-filesystem read/write HPFS.
Oh well, it would make more sense to have ext2fs for OS/2, since there are now so many more Linux users than OS/2.
- -- g-r-a-t-e-f-u-l-l-y---[ email:<fishbowl@conservatory.com> ]---l-i-v-i-n-g d-e-a-d-i-c-a-t-e-d---[ http://www.conservatory.com/~fishbowl ]-----l-i-g-h-t "His mind is like a steel trap -- full of mice" -- Foghorn Leghorn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i
iQBVAwUBMYoxgcPTedxmOfz5AQEeuAH/Xg0kCOGA+0szoJVsbN/CiUMOju/XhcRQ RqwBONw3m5RPMzf0NAEatj6/NJzcEPMT8JANUcy1IRkFs7+F4jd5Bw== =bz73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  |