Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 29 May 1996 11:25:34 -0400 | From | "Daniel S. Barclay" <> | Subject | Re: Java and the FSSTND |
| |
> From: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> ... > > I think all "non-native machine executables" (scripts, interpreted > code, etc.) should have the full name of their interpreter in them.
I hope you don't mean the absolute pathname of the interpreter. Interpreted scripts/files/whatever shouldn't have to know where the interpreter is installed.
If you mean some full one-level filename or abstract interpreter name (e.g., to be looked up in a table), that would be good.
Daniel
|  |