Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | (Christopher T. Johnson) | Subject | Re: Linux-1.99 (pre2.0.x) | Date | Sat, 25 May 1996 19:23:39 -0400 (EDT) |
| |
> Ulrich Windl was heard saying .... > > > > It seems the pre2 patches are to indicate the "utimate code freeze". > > Unfortunately the naming convention breaks the patch-kernel script! > > Why not going on with 101? > > > > Shhhh! Listen! Do you hear it? The sound of scripts breaking > EVERYWHERE!
I found patch-kernel just a few days ago and love it, yes it did break with pre2.0 but I think the following code might be useful.
I still had to install the patch-pre2.0.1.gz by hand, but no biggy.
--- linux-1.3.100/scripts/patch-kernel Tue Mar 26 14:22:14 1996 +++ linux/scripts/patch-kernel Sat May 25 13:55:48 1996 @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ exit 1 fi
+if [ $PATCHLEVEL -eq 99 ] +then + PATCHLEVEL=0 + VERSION=`expr $VERSION + 1` + VERSION=pre"$VERSION" +fi echo "Current kernel version is $VERSION.$PATCHLEVEL.$SUBLEVEL"
while : @@ -49,5 +55,6 @@ break fi # Remove backup files +exit find $sourcedir/ '(' -name '*.orig' -o -name '.*.orig' ')' -exec rm -f {} \; done
|  |