[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: A little pre-2.0 input
On 25 May 1996, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Don't assume that just because there is no .config, there is no old
> > configuration.
> On the contrary. The reasonable way to supply old config to a new kernel is
> to copy .config from old to new, and then run "make oldconfig". I don't
> know why you would want to replace defconfig.

I don't know exactly the reasons behind .config/defconfig both existing,
but I think that defconfig shouldn't be altered ever, and that .config
should be copied to defconfig at a late stage of "make vmlinux" (or some
other target that is done when building vmlinux). Oh well proberbly won't
happen, just my opinion.

> I also don't know why you would want to run "make mrproper" before
> compiling a new kernel. "make clean" should be sufficient. (In theory,
> "touch config.h" should be sufficient.) If not, that's a bug in the
> Makefiles.

"make clean" is sufficient, if the patch dosn't change the dependancies (ie
create new files/delete existing files), other wise a "make dep" is needed.

> Matthias Urlichs
PGP key pass phrase forgotten, \ Overload -- core meltdown sequence
again :( | initiated.
/ This space is intentionally left
| blank, apart from this text ;-)

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.044 / U:1.280 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site