lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: CONFIG_RANDOM option for 1.99.2
Date
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
>I agree with you in general, but the problem is that there are too many
>tuning knobs already. Asking the user to go through a complicated list
>of checklist items, which for typical usage will always be set in a
>certain way, is just poor design. Especially since we're not even
>testing most of the combinations of compilation options --- that's
>combinatorically impossible right now.

Why not just put a (STANDARD/ADVANCED) knob at the beginning,
the same way there is a (STABLE/EXPERIMENTAL) knob already ?
--
Paul Svensson _ /| Every absurdity needs a champion to defend it
SM5SJS \'o.0' http://www.lysator.liu.se/~paul/home.html
+46 13 121021 =(___)= _ _
paul@lysator.liu.se U Luftvarnsgatan 62, 587 34 Linkoping, Sweden


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.053 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site