[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Sleeping on the job
> > there's no mechanism to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum;
> > that's 10 ms in normal x86 linux.
> Ya, I know that. But do I need to worry about delays that are over

Actually to be more exact:

"There is no wahy to sleep for less than a scheduler quantum except busy
waiting UNLESS you are waiting for an interrupt.. which is the normal case"

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.044 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site