[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: CONFIG_RANDOM option for 1.99.2
>   Yes, but nonsecurity-related userspace programs might also want good random
> numbers. Consider a simulation using the Monte Carlo method--pseudorandom
> numbers might produce misleading results.
>Someone who's running Monte Carlo simulations hopefully has a fair bit
>of memory available, and knows enough about random number generators
>to realize the importance of a good one. For that matter, the problem
>with random numbers for Monte Carlo methods is rarely the quality of
>the seed, but rather the quality of the generator (the f(x+1) term).
>If the generator has poor spectral properties, it doesn't matter how
>good the initial seed was.
>/dev/random generates an excellent initial random number, and perhaps
>a small number more such numbers. It's not designed for generating
>the millions of random numbers that a simulation may need. It is
>designed for generating a small number of random numbers to serve as
>cryptographic keys.

Yeah, OK, you win. I just like the idea of a /dev/random and picked an
argument in its favor that had not yet been used (for good reason, it seems.
Oh well.)

-- Aaron Ucko (; finger for PGP public key) | httyp!
"That's right," he said. "We're philosophers. We think, therefore we am."
-- Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ | Geek Code 3.1 [for explanation, finger]: GCS/M/S/C d- s: a18 C++(+++)>++++ UL++>++++ P++
L++>+++++ E- W(-) N++(+) o+ K- w--- O M@ V-(--) PS++(+++) PE- Y(+) PGP(+) t(+)
!5 X-- R(-) tv-@ b++(+++) DI+ !D-- G++(+++) e->+++++(*) h!>+ r-(--)>+++ y?

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.023 / U:1.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site