Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 15 May 1996 16:20:07 -0700 (PDT) | From | Alex Gitelman <> | Subject | Re: 'java in kernel' defaults |
| |
However it's not a standard place for Java itself. If I copy or link Java stuff to /usr/bin it complains that on bad Java root directory. So, until somebody develops native Linux Java tools it would be better to follow Sun's Java conventions ( or guy's who did port). And until that time we, in fact, have no right to say that Linux supports Java binaries - it just invokes Sun's stuff to do job.
From all other points of view so called Java support is a very nice thing.
Alex Gitelman alexgit@sfsu.edu http://futon.sfsu.edu/~alexgit (510)-848-9014
On Tue, 14 May 1996, Alan Cox wrote:
> > pre2.0.3 is working fine for me. However, I'd > > just wanted to point out that the defaults for the path > > to the java binary in /usr/src/linux/fs/binfmt_java.c > > point to '/usr/bin/java'--while java.txt recommends > > /usr/local/java/bin/java. > > After editing binfmt_java.c, executing java > > programs worked out great. Thanks! > > It should be /usr/bin. The fact its a kernel path implies its a standard app > therefore not in /usr/local (see the FSSTND) > > Alan > > >
|  |