Messages in this thread |  | | From | jerijian@seas ... | Subject | Kernel README file and version numbers | Date | Mon, 13 May 1996 00:49:19 -0700 (PDT) |
| |
Hi,
Now that we've reached pre-2.0.x status, it's time that we consider changing the version numbers in README from 1.3.x to 2.0 (or maybe pre-2.0 until 2.0 is actually released). This will prevent another README version number bug that plagued Linux 1.2.0. :*) BTW, Linus, if you are reading this, may you consider updating the Java interface to Brian Lantz' 1.02 while Linux is still pre-2.0? It fixes a few bugs as well as adding a /proc/sys interface. Also, I've noticed another experimental oversight: the kernel config scripts still ask me if I want to compile support for the Amiga FFS even if I've disabled prompting for "EXPERIMENTAL" stuff. Thanks. I apologize if I ask too many "may you please?" questions. But since we are getting close to release... Ahh..I'm looking forward to 2.0. I know I'm going to perform an upgarade rush once this kernel is released. Sunsite, get ready, 'cause I'm going to download it all, from pppd 2.2.0x to procps 0.99a to mtools 2.5.4! I'm as hyped up about Linux 2.0 as a Windows fanatic was hyped up about Win95 nine months ago.
-- Arthur D. Jerijian | I grant MSN permission to redistribute jerijian@seas.ucla.edu | my portions of this message free of a540adj@helios.math.ucla.edu | charge. adj@ucla.edu | I'm not speaking for any organization.
|  |