[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why touch the CMOS clock?
> This is essentially right. But the kernel can also do elaborate time-ke=
> eping
> using external clocks (eg. radio clocks) or network services (NTP...),
> which renders the kernel time *much* more precise than the RTC. The
> kernel therefore needs to update the RTC in order to limit its drift.

If you dont have the chance to update your clock via ntp, then the
RTC is *much more* accurate than the internal, interrupt driven timer-clock.
After one or two weeks uptime, the interrupt clock had a drift of two hours,
reported a friend of mine. We fixed this by "clock -r" every hour.
I hope the kernel does *not* update the RTC itself , now does it ?


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.049 / U:0.968 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site