Messages in this thread |  | | From | lilo <> | Date | Sun, 12 May 1996 09:43:52 -0500 (CDT) | Subject | Re: Why touch the CMOS clock? |
| |
On Sat, 11 May 1996, Herbert Rosmanith wrote:
> If you dont have the chance to update your clock via ntp, then the > RTC is *much more* accurate than the internal, interrupt driven timer-clock. > After one or two weeks uptime, the interrupt clock had a drift of two hours, > reported a friend of mine. We fixed this by "clock -r" every hour. > I hope the kernel does *not* update the RTC itself , now does it ?
You've tried using adjtime to correct the problem? That is to say, are you saying the speed of the clock varies, or the speed is unsuitable without modification?
lilo
|  |