Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Bad 1.3.95 interactive performance (fwd) | Date | Sat, 11 May 1996 23:04:48 +0300 | From | Terje Bergstrom <> |
| |
> > On lightly loaded machine ncrB2L and Drew's drivers perform exactly the > > same. When I started using X and use constantly around 10MB swap (16MB > > memory), my system's performance went down greatly. I thought it was just > > because of having too little memory and too many memory-hungry programs. > If you set up the both drivers in the same configuration, you must have > the same behaviour for your system. > Prior to deciding to adapt Bsd driver, I had worked on the standard > driver rel 11. I know where are the differences.
I did what you suggested and after several days of testing ncrB2L seems to perform a lot better. Thanks for the suggestions.
-- http://www.iki.fi/terje/
|  |