[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Bad 1.3.95 interactive performance (fwd)
> > On lightly loaded machine ncrB2L and Drew's drivers perform exactly the 
> > same. When I started using X and use constantly around 10MB swap (16MB
> > memory), my system's performance went down greatly. I thought it was just
> > because of having too little memory and too many memory-hungry programs.
> If you set up the both drivers in the same configuration, you must have
> the same behaviour for your system.
> Prior to deciding to adapt Bsd driver, I had worked on the standard
> driver rel 11. I know where are the differences.

I did what you suggested and after several days of testing ncrB2L seems to
perform a lot better. Thanks for the suggestions.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.021 / U:8.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site