Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 8 May 1996 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT) | From | Ian main <> | Subject | Re: Linux logo |
| |
On Mon, 6 May 1996, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan Myr=E9en?= wrote:
> > > > > Does anyone with a fireproof vest and a good drawing hand want to > > > hmm. i don't think FreeBSD is the "adversary" here, but Windows 95 > > > certainly is. how about a penguin smashing in a window or something? > > how about the penguin knocking down and standing on the old Win 3.1 splash > > I don't think the Logo should attack *any* operating system, not BSD nor > Windows. As somebody said already: If Linux is so great, why are we attacking > BSD? And if Windows is such a pile of crap, why would we even care to mention > it? Let Linux stand out on its own merits. Action speaks louder than words. > > My vote goes for a simple, professionally done and easily recognizable > symbol. (I know, it isn't easy.) Isn't that what a logo is all about, a > simple symbol done with style, which immediately makes the viewer think of > the product it symbolizes? > > Johan Myreen > jem@iki.fi > > Ps. Ray-traced pictures are getting *boring*, IMHO... >
I understand it's kind of fun to knock Windoze but I AGREE!!! Not in the logo that's for sure! Like the man says.. Linux is good enough.. what do we care about the others?
|  |