Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Konstantin Olchanski) | Subject | Re: FreeVMS? (long) | Date | 9 May 1996 13:45:10 GMT |
| |
In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.960506010827.21683C-100000@evergreen.cc.usm.edu>, "Jonathan A. Davis" <jonathan@evergreen.cc.usm.edu> writes: > > P.S. There is an "interesting" postscript to this. Digital is expected > to submit OpenVMS to X/Open for certification under the common Unix95 > specification -- and it is expected to pass without difficulty. Digital > could then legally call it "OpenVMS Unix". Kinda makes me itch all over, > doesn't it you?
That *is* good. There will be one Usenet flame war less- the VMS versus Unix flame war will become part of the "my unix is better than your unix" war.
C.O.
|  |