[lkml]   [1996]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: dropping kerneld...
Anno Domini 30 Apr 96 at 8:01, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> In, article <>,
> "Lauri Tischler" <> writes:
> > Yup, I'm missing a lot of pain and useless complications by not
> > using kerneld and modules. Quite useless contraptions both.
> >
> Before modules and initrd, I've had to build a kernel for each of these
> beasts. Ugh. Now, I build the kerneld 100% modularized (OK, OK, binfmt_elf
> and ext2 aren't, but they're used on every system anyway). Initrd then just
> loads one SCSO adapter after the other until one is found...
Yech.. sounds nutty and dangerous.
Why dont you just load appropiate modules directly without kerneld ?

I have said before that kerneld _might_ have a place somewhere where
underpowered hardware is the _only_ choise. (compare travelling 3000
km's with bicycle instead by airplane).

Saving 100-300 kilobytes of memory is truly not worth the hassle in
any 'normal' systems.

Thought for the day:
Communist (n): one who has given up all hope
of becoming a Capitalist.

Lauri Tischler, Network Admin Tel: +358-0-47846331
Finlandia Interface Oy Fax: +358-0-47846500
Piispanportti 12 (PL 61) GSM: +358-40-5569010
02211 Espoo FINLAND Internet:

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.045 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site