lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: dropping kerneld...
Date
Kevin wrote:
>
> Michael Meskes writes:
>
> > Kevin Buettner writes:
> > >
> > > Let me cast a "vote" in favor of kerneld.
> >
> > Hmm, it seems I missed an important threat.
> >
> > > I don't really see the point in using modules at all without a
> > > ...
> >
> > I agree totally with your point. I not only use kerneld, but also use i=
> t
> > without the slightest problems. So why taking it out?
>
>
> Linus decided to remove it when someone (Simon Shapiro?) reported that
> his kernel went into a "coma". Here is the relevant post:
>

Actually, he commented out _arpd_ from the configuration, not kerneld.
We'll have arpd going again Real Soon...

Bjorn "still hacking" Ekwall


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.105 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site