[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ALPHA ambiguity
Thus spake Taner Halicioglu:
> On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, Mike Shaver wrote:
> > (Perhaps `Alpha quality' and `Digital AXP' to be even clearer?)
> What's wrong with "DecAlpha" (for the machine, of course), and leave
> "Alpha" to describe alpha-stage development? You can always name the
> directory "decalpha"... Just seems logical to me *shrug*
> (I only post this 'cuz I haven't seen it suggested yet - unless it got
> lost somewhere ;-)

Because you've still got one ambiguity:
Alpha could still mean either, and unless you're very conscious of the
convention in use, you won't know. We need 2 terms, neither of which
can be mistaken for the other, and which don't require knowledge of
the other to understand.

We may have to use two words for each. =)


#> Mike Shaver ( Ingenia Communications Corporation <#
#> Chief System Architect -- will tame sendmail(8) for food <#
#> <#
#> "You are a very perverse individual, and I think I'd like to get to <#
#> know you better." --- <#

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.047 / U:1.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site