Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: As 2.0 looms | Date | Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:22:51 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Andrew E. Mileski" <> |
| |
For what it's worth, I'm 100% in agreement. AXP makes sense.
> I like a suggestion made earlier: > > Rename arch-dependent DEC Alpha stuff to AXP. i.e., instead of: > > .../linux/arch/alpha > > we could have: > > .../linux/arch/axp > > People know the DECChips as AXPs as well as Alphas. It would make > sense, and that would let us keep the Alpha/Beta nomenclature for > software completeness/functionality levels.
-- Andrew E. Mileski mailto:aem@ott.hookup.net http://www.redhat.com/~aem/ Linux Plug-and-Play Project http://www.redhat.com/pnp/ "You can't have everything. Where would you put it?" - Steven Wright
| |