lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: dropping kerneld...

Message has been automatically signed by PGPsendmail 1.4,
available from ftp.atnf.csiro.au:pub/people/rgooch


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:

> Kevin Buettner writes:
> >
> > Let me cast a "vote" in favor of kerneld.
>
> Hmm, it seems I missed an important threat.
>
> > I don't really see the point in using modules at all without a
> > ...
>
> I agree totally with your point. I not only use kerneld, but also use it
> without the slightest problems. So why taking it out?
>

Hear, hear. For us poor folks who can't afford huge amounts of RAM,
kerneld is pretty nice. Not using my CD-ROM? There's 50K freed up.
Printer? Another 20K. Etc, etc.

If you take it out, I'll patch it right back in.

B

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian R. Doherty | "You know, I bet a funny thing about driving a
6320 S. Main St. | car off a cliff is, while you're in midair, you
Houston, TX 77006 | still hit those brakes! Hey, better try the
doherty@rice.edu | emergency brake!" -- Jack Handey

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMYUUxWr8tJOG0vRxAQFiZwQAqX5Kq+I0s1IjM/791cNZHn9lFSOWCEb3
5/MBK940xboYrjB79od2fqDnViZHunFGh7U66QNpyqI2/9oy9maeuhnyK/KDC5JD
NUeMaFj2gwvh/9YtT3+JVDXqci0UXvxJxZRbhB2VGh7lEBE4oeAVJiSJpg++XUj3
OV3Av/fJdmQ=
=m3l1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans