Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:13:06 -0500 (CDT) | From | Brian Raymond Doherty <> | Subject | Re: dropping kerneld... |
| |
Message has been automatically signed by PGPsendmail 1.4, available from ftp.atnf.csiro.au:pub/people/rgooch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Kevin Buettner writes: > > > > Let me cast a "vote" in favor of kerneld. > > Hmm, it seems I missed an important threat. > > > I don't really see the point in using modules at all without a > > ... > > I agree totally with your point. I not only use kerneld, but also use it > without the slightest problems. So why taking it out? >
Hear, hear. For us poor folks who can't afford huge amounts of RAM, kerneld is pretty nice. Not using my CD-ROM? There's 50K freed up. Printer? Another 20K. Etc, etc.
If you take it out, I'll patch it right back in.
B
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brian R. Doherty | "You know, I bet a funny thing about driving a 6320 S. Main St. | car off a cliff is, while you're in midair, you Houston, TX 77006 | still hit those brakes! Hey, better try the doherty@rice.edu | emergency brake!" -- Jack Handey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMYUUxWr8tJOG0vRxAQFiZwQAqX5Kq+I0s1IjM/791cNZHn9lFSOWCEb3 5/MBK940xboYrjB79od2fqDnViZHunFGh7U66QNpyqI2/9oy9maeuhnyK/KDC5JD NUeMaFj2gwvh/9YtT3+JVDXqci0UXvxJxZRbhB2VGh7lEBE4oeAVJiSJpg++XUj3 OV3Av/fJdmQ= =m3l1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  |