Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 30 Apr 1996 11:04:55 +0200 (MET DST) | From | Hans Lermen <> | Subject | Re: dropping kerneld... |
| |
On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> Michael Meskes writes: > > Kevin Buettner writes: > > > Let me cast a "vote" in favor of kerneld.
Yup, plus my "vote" !
I really can't see why it was even considered being a candidate to remove. If there are problems with it, they should be fixed. There are problems in _many_ other parts of the kernel too, will we also disable these parts ?
> > Linus decided to remove it when someone (Simon Shapiro?) reported that > his kernel went into a "coma". Here is the relevant post: > [ ... ] > : Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 13:48:34 +0300 (EET DST) > : From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@cs.helsinki.fi> > [ ... ] > : Ok, "kerneld" goes disabled in the next kernel, and won't be resuscitated until > : after 2.0 is out unless somebody really starts to look into this thing. I'm not > : using kerneld personally, and for a few reasons I don't think I _will_ be using > : it in the near future, so I won't be fixing this. > : > : Bjvrn? > : > : Linus
Hans <lermen@elserv.ffm.fgan.de>
|  |