[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: ALPHA ambiguity
On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, Mike Shaver wrote:

> (Perhaps `Alpha quality' and `Digital AXP' to be even clearer?)

What's wrong with "DecAlpha" (for the machine, of course), and leave
"Alpha" to describe alpha-stage development? You can always name the
directory "decalpha"... Just seems logical to me *shrug*

(I only post this 'cuz I haven't seen it suggested yet - unless it got
lost somewhere ;-)

-------------------------=[ D. Taner Halicioglu ]=---------------------------- The San Diego Supercomputer Center, Workstation Services U. of California, San Diego - Revelle - Computer Sci.
IRC Admin for EPRI - 3412 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, CA
-------------=[ Linux 1.3.* OS - ]=---------------

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.030 / U:3.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site