lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: dropping kerneld...
Date
> 
> Yup, I'm missing a lot of pain and useless complications by not
> using kerneld and modules. Quite useless contraptions both.
>

If you have a lot of 2M and 4M machines doing various "odd jobs"
around your network then modules and kerneld provide a nice solution.
I can use a single kernel for each, only the conf.modules file is different,
very nice. If you need to mount a filesystem you dont normaly then its
transparent and the memory hit is temp. Or maybe you need to dial in via
ppp once a month for an hour, why have ppp loaded all the time on a 2M box.
I cant get this price/performance anywhere but Linux and modules/kerneld
play an important role.

Mike Kilburn




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans