[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: As 2.0 looms
    > > There are millions of these, core dumping etc. Its basically I think a 
    > > unix feature. At least we dont have compiled in passwords like GCOS3
    > > had.
    > I believe core dumping is OK (the dumpable flag is cleared if the program
    > is unreadable). I know of at least one program (deslogin) which has
    > encryption key compiled in (the binary is mode 711). I shouldn't have
    > to link it statically to be safe... Another solution, which doesn't
    > need kernel support, would be to have two versions of one which
    > ignores LD_xxx and one which is like the current You decide
    > which one you want to use at link time (default is to ignore LD_xxx -
    > it's not necessary except for testing new shared libraries). I think
    > HP-UX does something like this. If we had this, we wouldn't have the
    > infamous telnet environment security hole...

    I would like to see this too. I also cant believe its a difficult thing
    to produce. Also a bash that ignored ENV so I could let users near pppd
    without making a machine totally insecure.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.016 / U:7.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site