[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: As 2.0 looms

>I believe core dumping is OK (the dumpable flag is cleared if the program
>is unreadable). I know of at least one program (deslogin) which has
>encryption key compiled in (the binary is mode 711). I shouldn't have
>to link it statically to be safe... Another solution, which doesn't
>need kernel support, would be to have two versions of one which
>ignores LD_xxx and one which is like the current

>You decide
>which one you want to use at link time (default is to ignore LD_xxx -
>it's not necessary except for testing new shared libraries). I think

LD_xxx is also needed for programs such as zlibc, which work by
redefining certain library calls. Ignoring LD_xxx by default would
make any such program impractical.


Email: Alain Lucien Knaff .
Tel.(work): (33) 76 61 52 68 .
Tel.(home): (33) 76 85 23 05 Appartement 310b .
(répondeur) =====O=====/ 11,rue Général Mangin.
Fax : (33) 76 61 52 52 =====O=====/ 38100 Grenoble France.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:2.020 / U:2.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site