lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: As 2.0 looms (fwd)
Jim Nance writes:
> > Firstly we need to categorise each existing "Alpha", "experimental" or whatever
> > driver appropriately. Some drivers marked ALPHA are most definitely not now
> > ALPHA. Other stuff like the masquerade proxy agents and multicast routing
> > need to be ALPHA clearly.
>
> One thing that can be slightly confusing is that there is an architecture
> named alpha, and a quality estimate called alpha. So when the configure
> script asks something like:
>
> Kernel/User network link driver(ALPHA) (CONFIG_NETLINK) [N/y/?]
>
> Your not really sure if it means that its of ALPHA quality or only runs
> on the ALPHA. Im not sure if this is enough of a problem to fix, but I
> though I would point it out.
>

Amen!!! Hear, hear!!! Right on!!! I agree, even!!!

Rick


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.056 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site