Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Apr 1996 13:03:49 -0700 | From | Ronald Schalk <> | Subject | Re: Stable? |
| |
Tamas Nyitrai wrote:
> I do not understand. Which kernel would be called stable in the future, > the 1.4.xx one, or a new series begining with 2.0.xx ??? > > Because if 1.4.xx will be, then we are not far away... at least with the > numbering... :))) ... and we could be even close to 1.4.xx if you will > leave out the 1.3.95 piece... :)
Simple like the days of 0.96: 1.3.99a, 1.3.99b or: 1.3.100 And probably Linus is innovative enough to think of hundreds of other scheme's! Can't wait till 1.3.99++
-- Ronald Schalk E-Mail prive: RSchalk@pi.net E-Mail zakelijk: Ronald.Schalk@interpay.nl
| |