lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: As 2.0 looms
Excerpts from internet.computing.linux-kernel: 22-Apr-96 As 2.0 looms by
Alan Cox@lxorguk.ukuu.or
> Firstly we need to categorise each existing "Alpha", "experimental" or
> whatever
> driver appropriately. Some drivers marked ALPHA are most definitely not now
> ALPHA. Other stuff like the masquerade proxy agents and multicast routing
> need to be ALPHA clearly.

The AT1700 driver is relatively stable. I haven't had a serious lockup
with it for about a monthFrom owner-linux-kernel-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu Wed Apr 24 09:20:01 1996
Received: from orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us (orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us [198.111.176.4]) by herbie.ucs.indiana.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10201 for <linuxkernel@herbie.ucs.indiana.edu>; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:20:01 -0500
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu by orchard.washtenaw.cc.mi.us (8.6.10/2.3)
with ESMTP id KAA21812; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:12:45 -0400
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <106372-148>; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:53:13 -0500
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:05:32 +0200 (MDT)
From: Michael De La Rue <mikedlr@indy.unipress.waw.pl>
To: ulmo@q.net
cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Correction: 1.3.91 top is strange
In-Reply-To: <svg29whsn9.fsf@Q.Net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960424085956.21016E-100000@indy.unipress.waw.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk

On 22 Apr 1996 ulmo@q.net wrote:

> Hmm.
>
> Perhaps messages with the key words:
>
> ps
> top
>
> near the words:
>
> funny
> my
> doesn't
> work
> just
> upgraded
> 1\.3\.[?-9][0-9]


without the keyword

greased-ps-magic-hedgehog-procfile-cooookie-monster

?

>
> should automatically be diverted for moderation instead of put onto
> the list. I'll volunteer to moderate them, perhaps making a digest of
> all of the posts anyway in case there's one that wasn't fixed by the
> procps answer (they do exist).

should get an autoreply??? easier on your time

But then you get all the anti moderation freaks coming up:- "no no that's
censorship" (they're sort of right, if a bit perverse ;-)

how about also tacking on a footer

-------
This message has been automatically replied to with the standard procps
victim sheet. Please reply if you think that wasn't relevant..
-------

and sending it to the list?

<http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~mikedlr/biography.html>
Scottish Climbing Archive: <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~mikedlr/climbing/>
Linux/Unix clone@ftp://src.doc.ic.ac.uk/packages/linux/sunsite.unc-mirror/docs/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.161 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site