[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: memtest86, built into kernel
Matti E. Aarnio writes:
>> No mainframes ran with ECC memory boards, so hardware faults got logged.
>> PC's _had_ parity to show you errors in RAM. Now they don't bother (I guess
>> because the people who make the PC's make so much bad memory they dont want
>> you to find out).
> Pick "General" from that (the URL is VERY long..), and
> go see about "Evaluating the Need for Parity in Desktop PCs"

Basically they say there that with modern SIMMs the MTBF for a soft
error (ie. alpha particle corruption) is between 12-30 years of
continual system use.

Given that it happens so rarely, that parity is only 50% likely to
catch the error anyway, and that parity requires an extra 12.5% DRAM,
it doesn't seem worth it to me. ECC is more useful, since it will
correct single-bit errors rather than just hanging.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.028 / U:1.728 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site