[lkml]   [1996]   [Apr]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: memtest86, built into kernel
    Matti E. Aarnio writes:
    >> No mainframes ran with ECC memory boards, so hardware faults got logged.
    >> PC's _had_ parity to show you errors in RAM. Now they don't bother (I guess
    >> because the people who make the PC's make so much bad memory they dont want
    >> you to find out).
    > Pick "General" from that (the URL is VERY long..), and
    > go see about "Evaluating the Need for Parity in Desktop PCs"

    Basically they say there that with modern SIMMs the MTBF for a soft
    error (ie. alpha particle corruption) is between 12-30 years of
    continual system use.

    Given that it happens so rarely, that parity is only 50% likely to
    catch the error anyway, and that parity requires an extra 12.5% DRAM,
    it doesn't seem worth it to me. ECC is more useful, since it will
    correct single-bit errors rather than just hanging.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.016 / U:2.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site