lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: testing
From
Date
> Those of us at the bottom of the list don't fare as well...
...
> Here in Connecticut (a 3 hour drive from rutgers.edu)
> received at Mon, 4 Mar 1996 11:30:08 -0500
>
> I received the David Arnold <arnold@dstc.edu.au> reply shortly thereafter:
> received at Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:17:54 -0500
>
> The interesting piece of the mails is this machine that i've never heard of;
> it must be a relative of vger.
> ---
> Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by
> puck.nether.net (8.7.3/8.6.9+jared) with ESMTP id MAA01529;
> Mon, 4 Mar 1996 12:03:51 -0500

Yes, trying to push a huge flood of messages thru sendmail
does have its disadvantages. You will propably get them
faster straight from VGER, than via re-exploder, though it
will slow down the vger quite a bit.

The machine (puck) is small 486 with IDE disks, VGER is
big (at least the box) SPARC.

Dave receives messages straight from VGER thru special
"rutgers.edu"-channel, thus he sees fast turnaround.

/Matti Aarnio <mea@nic.funet.fi> <mea@utu.fi>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.034 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site