[lkml]   [1996]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: older gcc and pentium

On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Mike Castle wrote:

> Amazingly enough Kai Schulte said:
> > Really 486? Don't the -m486 alignments bloat the code unnecessarily?
> Well, if using more memory results in faster memory accesses, is
> it unnecessary? The alignments result in faster code accesses.
> But if you have limited core, perhaps the compact code is more
> appropriate.

It results in more speed for 486-specific accesses, but not for a 386,
and not necessarily for a 586, either. Can somebody with "real" hardware
knowledge help out on this? I really don't know enough about the
architectures, but i'll take a closer look at the new gcc as soon as I
have the time, promised ;)


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:36    [W:0.021 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site