Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | (Matthias Urlichs) | Subject | Re: Shell-Script problems | Date | 8 Dec 1996 08:51:31 +0100 |
| |
In linux.dev.kernel, article <Pine.LNX.3.95.961207163908.3415C-100000@moisil.wal.rhno.columbia.edu>, Ion Badulescu <ionut@moisil.wal.rhno.columbia.edu> writes: > > The changes are trivial, but before changing anything I'd like to hear > what other people think about this issue - whether the name of the process > as appears in /proc/<pid>/stat should be the name of the interpreter (for > compatibility reasons) or the name of the interpreted script. > The latter.
> --- linux/fs/binfmt_script.c.old Sat Dec 7 20:47:27 1996 > +++ linux/fs/binfmt_script.c Sat Dec 7 20:47:32 1996 > @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ > /* > * OK, now restart the process with the interpreter's inode. > */ > - bprm->filename = interp; > retval = open_namei(interp, 0, 0, &bprm->inode, NULL); > if (retval) > return retval; > Uh, what? This is already gone in 2.0.27.
-- Department meeting in 3 minutes. -- Matthias Urlichs \ noris network GmbH / Xlink-POP Nürnberg Schleiermacherstraße 12 \ Linux+Internet / EMail: urlichs@noris.de 90491 Nürnberg (Germany) \ Consulting+Programming+Networking+etc'ing PGP: 1024/4F578875 1B 89 E2 1C 43 EA 80 44 15 D2 29 CF C6 C7 E0 DE Click <A HREF="http://info.noris.de/~smurf/finger">here</A>. 42
|  |