Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Dec 1996 18:12:31 -0500 (EST) | From | "D. Chiodo" <> | Subject | Re: your mail |
| |
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, George Byrkit wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 15:53:41 -0500 > From: George Byrkit <ghbyrkit@concentric.net> > To: submit-linux-dev-kernel@ratatosk.yggdrasil.com > Newsgroups: linux.dev.kernel > Subject: Re: your mail > > > Someone wrote: > > > > > > This is certainly one interpretation of the U.S. Export laws. Other > > > people have made other interpretations. Unless someone is a real > > > lawyer, and is willing to render a real Legal Opinion, people playing > > > net.lawyer is probably not a productive use of the linux-kernel channel. > > Not even true! Only a JUDGE can render a Legal Opinion. And it's > called a decision or verdict or whatever. A Lier can only tell you what > s/he thinks the 'Legal Opinion' would be, or would be if you retain the > services of that Lier.
Anyone can have an "opinion"
A lawyer can have a "legal opinion".
Judges and Juries can have "findings", and "verdicts", which are the only thing that actually have any teeth of the above.
> > And who has the money to try to go up against the UncleSam Legal > Department (Janet Reno and the DofJ and the Court of Supremes)? > > Regards, > George Byrkit
|  |