Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 5 Dec 1996 21:25:06 +0000 (GMT) | From | Philip Blundell <> | Subject | Re: PNP patch into kernel when? |
| |
On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Andrew E. Mileski wrote:
> I think this squashes all the complaints put forward so far. > If not, please remind me.
I've just been looking at the PnP patch in slightly more detail. Is there any chance you could use a slightly more conventional layout style? I find that function definitions laid out as
/* * Find an empty region entry. */ static hwres_entry_t * find_empty ( void ) { int i; ... }
are a bit visually jarring, and they don't match any other part of the kernel that I know of. Since I imagine many people may want to work on the resource manager, it seems polite to stick to the standard coding style.
phil
|  |