lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Which of the latest 2.0.x-versions is stable? None with NFS?


I've had not 'kernel' related problems and I'm runnint 2.0.27
and use NFS daily. I don't use amd.

Linux jd 2.0.27 #2 Sun Dec 1 21:33:53 PST 1996 i586

On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Alan Cox wrote:

> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 12:19:04 -0800
> From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> To: dwmw2@cam.ac.uk
> Cc: zie@lte.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de, linux-smp@vger.rutgers.edu,
> linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: Which of the latest 2.0.x-versions is stable? None with NFS?
>
>
> > So I think it's the NFS support in the kernel, not amd. I thought as much
> > anyway - even if amd was completely screwed, it shouldn't bring the entire
> > machine grinding to a halt if the kernel's sound.
> >
> > Is anyone looking into this problem?
>
> Make amd and the mount use a 1K block size then tell me if you can reproduce
> the hang
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.088 / U:3.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site