Messages in this thread | | | Date | 4 Dec 1996 10:47:03 -0000 | From | richard@speciali ... | Subject | Re: smbfs vs nfs |
| |
In article <199612020509.XAA22411@phaedrus.uchicago.edu> you wrote:
: has anyone tried using smbfs in place of nfs and done a performance : comparison? any thoughts on this being a usable possibility?
I get about a 5% performance hit using smbfs rather than nfs talking to a big SCO box running samba, but even if smbfs was faster I would still use NFS as it exports permissions etc in a more usable way.
- Richard
-- Richard Hodson, Software engineer | richard@specialix.co.uk
| |