[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Subjectquestion about modules rewrite
Now that the kernel modules implementation has been rewritten for the
better and the interface changed somewhat, is there any reason to have
both sys_create_module() and sys_init_module()?

Why isn't the functionality of sys_create_module() in
sys_init_module()? It might be better to move it because then you
could have sys_create_module() return ENOSYS. This would have the
effect of causing the older, unsupported module utilities to bail out


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.025 / U:2.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site