Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 3 Dec 1996 19:25:27 +0100 (MET) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | source dependencies cleanup? [was: Re: Linux-2.0.27 and 2.1.14] |
| |
On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, John Alvord wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 1 Dec 1996, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > Just go back to the old depend maker. The 2.1.14 one is badly broken in > > > its assumption that all includes exist for all architectures > > > > hmm, the asm/* files are almost the same for all platforms. Maybe it would > > make sense to split up dependencies in the arch directory and in the main > > kernel tree?
i think we should introduce arch/include. 'include/asm/*' >funcionality< is mostly platform neutral already?
> In cases where there is a missing dependency, it might make sense to have > a dummy include file... a placeholder. The c source would be simplified by > having fewer conditionals.
i think it would be a bit unclear why we have 'vm86.h' in asm-sparc?
-- mingo
|  |