Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 21 Dec 1996 03:22:50 -0500 (EST) | From | Jon Lewis <> | Subject | Re: Why doesn't Apache/Stronghold like Linux 2.0.x? |
| |
On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, David N. Cicalo wrote:
> > You can try kernel 2.0.28 when it comes out. > > It should be "more stable" than 2.0.27 :) > > As suggested by another user, removing the STATS and INFO modules in > Apache/ Stringhold has solved the problem without making any other > changes. It's a simple modification in the the Makefile and a > recompile.
I think you'll find that wasn't the problem. I'd been running without those modules and was seeing Apache 1.1.1 cease to fork and answer requests. I recently added both those modules so I can sort of keep an eye on the status. I've heard we should upgrade to 1.2b2 or that we should do that _and_ define BROKEN_WAIT. I'm not sure what if either will solve the problem. BROKEN_WAIT looks like it adds some sanity checking to make sure server slots don't "vanish".
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr. ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
|  |