[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Proposal: restrict link(2)

On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, Adam D. Bradley wrote:

> Can someone just pull the POSIX spec on this so we can be done w/ it? (I
> would, but exams are kicking my butt...) As the goal for Linux is a
> fairly standard and POSIX-ized UNIX OS, "all others do the same" actually
> _is_ a valid argument...

I couldn't find a POSIX verdict in ISO 9945-1. All it says is EPERM is
returned it the user calling link() doesn't have "appropriate privileges"
and that "appropriate privileges" are implementation defined. That doesn't
seem to be much help.


| I told you I'm not very bright -- Sugar in "Some Like It Hot" |
| "RPM is the greatest thing since swap-space" - Bryan C. Andregg
| |
| Erik Troan = = |

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.050 / U:20.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site