lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject2.1.15 vs. "route"
Date

Ok. What happened? Or was I asleep at the switch when someone said
I needed to upgrade my network utilities? :-(

/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0

produces

route forgot to specify route netmask.
SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument

Just for grins, I try

/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0

and get

SIOCADDRT: No such device

So I try

/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo

and get no complaints, but none of "netstat -rn", "route", or
"cat /proc/net/route" say that a route was actually added.

IPv6 is *not* configured in my 2.1.X kernels.

Back to 2.1.14 until I figure out what's going on here...

--
Bob Tracy | "The gene pool could use a little chlorine."
AFIWC/AFCERT | -- Unknown
rct@merkin.csap.af.mil |

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.031 / U:3.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site