Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:35:40 -0500 | From | Neil Moore <> | Subject | Re: Linus v2.0 released (Male?) |
| |
> > > On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Erik Troan wrote: > > > Congratulations, and we're all waiting for a new male version (perhaps > > > v2.1? nah, it's gotta be 2.2 at least) :-)) > > <anti-sexist> > > Why is it called "male"? If you happen to be making a refrence to the > stable kernels being "male" and the unstable ones being "female", I'd like > you to know that its hard enough being a female in the world of linux and > that this concept/refrence is quite rude and unfair, however funny you may > have found it. > > </anti-sexist> > > > Definitely. Any new male version will be under development for quite a while! > > It'll probably take *years* to mature into anything resembling a stable > > version. > > See the above. I am confused.
Read the Subject: carefully. It says `Linus 2.0', not `Linux 2.0'. Draw your own conclusions :)
-- -Neil Moore http://www.sfhs.floyd.k12.ky.us/~amethyst (finger amethyst@valjean.sfhs.floyd.k12.ky.us for my Geek Code)
| |