Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:36:36 -0800 (PST) | From | KRSE <> | Subject | Re: Linus v2.0 released (Male?) |
| |
On Tue, 10 Dec 1996, Erik Troan wrote: > > Congratulations, and we're all waiting for a new male version (perhaps > > v2.1? nah, it's gotta be 2.2 at least) :-))
<anti-sexist>
Why is it called "male"? If you happen to be making a refrence to the stable kernels being "male" and the unstable ones being "female", I'd like you to know that its hard enough being a female in the world of linux and that this concept/refrence is quite rude and unfair, however funny you may have found it.
</anti-sexist>
> Definitely. Any new male version will be under development for quite a while! > It'll probably take *years* to mature into anything resembling a stable > version.
See the above. I am confused.
Happily me, -Katy _____________________________________________________ |_Kaitlin_Rachael_Silver-Earthsong_(kota@pdxnet.com)__| |_web:_http://aurora.pdxnet.com_______________________| |_"Warez._What_do_you_want_to_pir8_today?"____________|
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2
mQENAzKbTNEAAAEH/2UbqYAZHdmUlr4dL9HhIxqXW3JpridOIe4ARxNnLbRDDf+R 9bHrYRfqMtFFQ9ctkrcC8LPtdOfBuRVqsUZL0KQ8rklJIl0B1yNxcaglcOOcUA2H KuY9H8K8ivBlYzt+qwvKFlqFCfBpWlRmKCuwLeB3aT/1/s5M+4E7lkaf6gSQdhnX yivA0oM5z/2CbvI22eiWToqGJVhrgTIrxISt+YPn6eEHQosCHAKSdNmmDWtkcCuw qm+g38WzZtdjo9SawGUiBB3u3iKaaHH4wugpN9NPPPAz7we6QAlA7P+YgZ6kEFnn X4hT3U8FhliNYvYsSh5ZfcwJ/92ZOsuWJe6W4PUABRG0MkthaXRsaW4gUmFjaGFl bCBTaWx2ZXItRWFydGhzb25nIDxrb3RhQHBkeG5ldC5jb20+ =TG+F -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|  |