Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 21 Nov 1996 16:39:51 -0700 (MST) | From | Derrik Pates <> | Subject | RFC: Modified FAT filesystem driver? |
| |
One thing I've considered in using the FAT filesystem drivers is, "Why do we need to have so many modules for this?" This is an option that may have already been looked into, but I figured I'd put it out there and see what people thought. What if, instead of having the base FAT module and an MSDOS fs module and a VFAT fs module that load on top, have the FAT module be extendable? I mean, have the "standard" configuration be to use plain jane 8.3 MSDOS filenames, but have an extra config option to enable VFAT LFN support, and then when the LFN support is compiled in, have a mount-time option whereby LFN support can be disabled for specific mounts. That way, for those who don't run Win95 or don't want to use VFAT for whatever reason, but want standard FAT FS support, the module/code built into the kernel only will do 8.3, but for those who want it, VFAT LFN support can be built into the same module/block of kernel code, instead of having two FS types. Let me know it this option has been unsuccessfully tried, or if you think it's a good idea, or whatever thoughts you may have. Thanks.
Derrik Pates dpates@cavern.nmsu.edu
"What'll you two lovable plush toys have?" "How 'bout a root beer popsicle and an Orange Julius? What about you, Max?" "Dishwater! And put it in a dirty glass!" -Sam & Max "Fair Wind to Java"
|  |