[lkml]   [1996]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: News gateway problem


On Tue, 19 Nov 1996, Albert Cahalan wrote:

> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 19:11:57 -0500 (EST)
> From: Albert Cahalan <>
> To:
> Subject: Re: News gateway problem
> From: (Alan Cox)
> >
> >>> I do NOT want my email address in any header. I am getting
> >>
> >> You should be able to put invalid addresses into your headers
> >> yourself, regardless of whether you use the news or the mail
> >> entry point.
> Poor, but it might be usable.
> > If you place false email addresses into your headers then if your
> > traffic enters the UK at least you will be committing an offence.
> Hmmm, most of the spammers do that. Has one been prosecuted?

Perhaps if they were it would discourage future spammers. Have _you_ filed
a legal complaint with the appropriate authorities concerning any of the
sapm you have received?

> The mail would come from vger, and it would have these headers intact:
> > From Tue Nov 19 17:17:31 1996
> > Sender:
> Is that good enough? I'm not a UK resident, so the transmission
> to vger is legal. I would not pretend to be someone else.
> I still think the gateway and archives should obscure addresses.
> I find spam in my mailbox every day, all of it because this list
> exposes my address on usenet.
> Does anybody remember why we use a mailing list instead of a
> newsgroup? Because vger has too much extra CPU power? :-)
> No, because we like to avoid spam and dumb questions. Oh, and
> because email is faster in theory.

Compared to usenet groups, this list has a fantastically high signal to
noise ratio..

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.056 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site