Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | Subject | [patch / 2.1.10] SMC Ultra cosmetic buglet | Date | Sat, 16 Nov 1996 19:30:06 -0500 (EST) | From | "Aaron Tiensivu" <> |
| |
It's against 2.1.10, but should go into just about any version.
This has bothered me for a while, so I decided to tidy it up a bit.
It changes the output of the init. of the driver.
From: SMC Ultra at 0x260, 00 00 C0 47 76 82,assigned IRQ 10 memory 0xe8000-0xebfff.
To: SMC Ultra at 0x260, 00 00 C0 47 76 82, assigned IRQ 10 memory 0xe8000-0xebfff.
Much nicer. :)
--- linux/drivers/net/smc-ultra.c.orig Sat Nov 16 18:28:52 1996 +++ linux/drivers/net/smc-ultra.c Sat Nov 16 18:31:30 1996 @@ -227,13 +227,13 @@ = dev->mem_start + (ei_status.stop_page - START_PG)*256;
if (piomode) { - printk(",%s IRQ %d programmed-I/O mode.\n", - eeprom_irq ? "EEPROM" : "assigned ", dev->irq); + printk(", %s IRQ %d programmed-I/O mode.\n", + eeprom_irq ? "EEPROM" : "assigned", dev->irq); ei_status.block_input = &ultra_pio_input; ei_status.block_output = &ultra_pio_output; ei_status.get_8390_hdr = &ultra_pio_get_hdr; } else { - printk(",%s IRQ %d memory %#lx-%#lx.\n", eeprom_irq ? "" : "assigned ", + printk(", %s IRQ %d memory %#lx-%#lx.\n", eeprom_irq ? "" : "assigned", dev->irq, dev->mem_start, dev->mem_end-1); ei_status.block_input = &ultra_block_input; ei_status.block_output = &ultra_block_output; --- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
|  |