Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 13 Nov 1996 22:59:14 -0500 (EST) | From | Elliot Lee <> | Subject | Re: time stamp resolution |
| |
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, D. Chiodo wrote:
> > Perhaps the ability to have an (almost) infinite number of supplementary > > groups assigned to a user. Yes, I know NFS doesn't support this, but at > > least libc & the kernel could. > > > > I'd say a perusal of /usr/include/limits.h, and #include'd files, would > > aid in finding limits that could use to be raised. > > Would it break anything to somehow enable different group permissions for > the same file? I have no idea how this would be implemented or if it would > break any compatibilty with anything.. > > I recently had something come up.. Wanted to set a directory as follows: > > owner all permissions > group 1 read > group 2 read/write > "world" no access
Hmm, perhaps instead of putting more max groups in 2.2, we should put ACL's - it's sure looking like it right now :)
-- Elliot
http://www.redhat.com/
|  |