Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 1 Nov 1996 23:49:02 GMT | From | Nuno Miguel Grilo <> | Subject | Re: X much slower in 2.0.24 than in 1.2.13 |
| |
In article <55d0on$81@nntp1.u.washington.edu> you wrote: : Can anyone explain this? : : 2.0.24 1.2.13 : ----------------------------------------- : 328430 722646 lineStones : 104285 175128 fillStones : 99677 157210 blitStones : 7024585 13667733 arcStones : 160187 306625 textStones : 363071 371830 complexStones : 156651 268754 xStones :
The tests I made gave the following results:
Linux 2.0.21 Linux 2.0.23 Linux 2.0.24 XFree86 3.1.2G XFree86 3.2 XFree86 3.2 --------------------------------------------------- 562143 520990 266274 lineStones 115116 106969 72958 fillStones 69564 63619 54042 blitStones 8297678 8376865 7669011 arcStones 190625 189406 97812 textStones 206666 187973 206993 complexStones 152523 142851 98572 xStones
The 2.0.23 and 2.0.24 kernels had the same configuration (the 2.0.21 I don't remenber).
My system has an AMD 5x86 overclocked to 160MHz, 16MB of memory and an ExpertColor S3 Trio64V+ video board with 2MB
-- Nuno Miguel Grilo l38486@alfa.ist.utl.pt
|  |